The Benefits of Embracing Failure

March 20, 2018

Failure. Not many people savor it or seek it out. But instead of focusing on disappointing outcomes, we should consider viewing failures as opportunities to learn and improve. One principle of agile software development is failing fast. Of course, the goal is not to aim for failure, but to recognize that failure is a necessary and beneficial part of the development process if you approach it properly. Research and development depends on iteratively generating, inspecting, and evaluating ideas, designs, and products. Great products aren’t miraculously conceived—they’re built, refined, and enhanced iteratively.

Learning About Others’ Failures Improves Persistence and Performance

Professors from Teachers College, Columbia University, and University of Washington wanted to see whether exposing students to stories of the intellectual or life struggles of famous scientists such as Albert Einstein, Marie Curie, and Michael Faraday would impact their own scientific achievements. They found that the performance of students who heard stories about others’ intellectual or life struggles in science classes actually improved, unlike that of students who were exposed only to stories of successes.

Supporter Advertisement
Continue Reading…

Detailed, personal, honest narratives drew the students in, humanizing famous scientists and enabling students to relate to them better. Students realized that achievement was not a result of innate talent and foresight, but a product of hard work, iterative refinement, and persistent motivation.

Failure Forces Reflection

Failure forces us to pause and reflect, allowing us to pivot and refocus on success. During Qualtrics’s Experience Week 2017, Stuart Butterfield, Slack’s CEO, discussed how he created two well-known, extremely successful products: Flickr and Slack. “The bad news is that they are close to impossible to replicate. Both are pivots from failed massively multiplayer games.”

Initially, his goal had been to create a multiplayer game, but the game was hard to explain to investors and didn’t prove commercially viable. So, instead of accepting defeat, he and his team decided to pivot and use the technology they’d built to create Flickr. Later, after Yahoo bought Flickr, Butterfield decided to try building his game once again.

“This time we couldn’t fail. Technology had advanced. Servers were really cheap compared to 2002; way more people [were] online. We were all better at what we did. There’s all this great open source software. The network had spread from a couple people having dialup at home to more or less [ubiquitous] broadband. And [we] failed again. But we spent three and a half years on it, and we had a cross-disciplinary team.”

Instead of being discouraged by yet another failed attempt, Butterfield saw this letdown as an opportunity to reevaluate his goals and see how he could use their years of work and cross-functional skills in a different way. He acknowledged failure and used it to prompt reflection, deciding to pivot to a communications platform. And it worked. Slack currently has over six million active users daily; nine million on a weekly basis.

Ryan Smith, Co-founder and CEO of Qualtrics, who led this interview with Butterfield summed things up: “It’s typically after the third, fourth, fifth, sixth iteration that you actually come upon something great. I think if that doesn’t exist, then you’re always going with the first or the second, [and] you don’t actually ever do anything.”

We must not become wedded to our first ideas. Instead, we need to watch constantly for signs of failure and be willing to adapt and change our goals based on external feedback.

Recognizing Failure Early Can Save Significant Time, Effort, and Money

Research plays a key role in recognizing and learning from failure. An excellent example of the value of research comes from a startup at Stanford that wanted to fly cameras over farm fields to collect data about optimizing the distribution of water and fertilizer. Initially, they planned to build drones to collect this data, but after talking to potential customers, they found that there were already many aerial drone businesses within the US. So, instead of having to invest heavily in hardware engineering and developing drones, they could simply partner with established crop-dusting businesses. This startup learned the value of early research, saving millions of dollars and years of their lives. Because they did not get too attached to their initial idea, they were able to adapt based on their research, ultimately building their product for a fraction of the time and cost.

Embracing Failure Is Key to Innovation

Frederik Pferdt, Chief Innovation Evangelist at Google, and Tim Brown, CEO of IDEO, discussed how they foster creativity within their organizations. Their answer? Launching ideas and products early to rapidly get feedback from users, then iterating on failures to create successes. There’s more to the equation though. If people are fearful of failure because of pay, promotion, or social penalties, innovation cannot and will not flourish. People need to feel secure and be able to try new things without fearing negative consequences. Psychological safety lets people admit their mistakes, learn from failure, and openly share their ideas, all of which lead to more innovation and better decision making. Thus, psychological safety lets people view failure as a learning experience, not a career-ending embarrassment, as Figure 1 shows.

Figure 1—Psychological danger versus safety
Psychological danger versus safety

Image source: Frederik Pferdt, Chief Innovation Evangelist at Google

If organizations give people permission to experiment and share their ideas early on, they’ll receive critical feedback and iterate and refine their ideas. As Frederik Pferdt points out, “The faster you fail, the faster you learn. If you fail in a week, instead of a quarter, it feels more like learning than failing.” Instead of blindly pouring time and money into a project, invest in early research and feedback opportunities.

We should acknowledge and publicize our failures, instead of sweeping them under the rug and pretending that we’re perfect. Rather than being paralyzed by fears of imperfection, we need to embrace failure—not as a possibility, but as a probability. By sharing our failures and what we’ve learned from them, we can help ourselves and others avoid repeating the same mistakes and embolden others to experiment, iterate, and refine their ideas and products.

Organizations must cultivate psychological safety, letting people try things and fail without fear of losing their job or reputation. Then, by coupling our newfound confidence with user-centered research, we can solve complex problems and spur incremental, sustainable innovation. 


Blank, Steve. “How Startups Should Do Customer Discovery.” Medium, November 27, 2017. Retrieved March 14, 2018.

Lin-Siegler, Xiaodong, Janet N. Ahn, Jondou Chen, Fu-Fen Anny Fang, and Myra Luna-Lucero. “Even Einstein Struggled: Effects of Learning About Great Scientists’ Struggles on High School Students’ Motivation to Learn Science.” (PDF) Journal of Educational Psychology, 2016. Retrieved March 14, 2018.

Pferdt, Frederik, and Tim Brown. “This Is the Way Google and IDEO Foster Creativity.” IDEOU, 2017. Retrieved March 14, 2018.

Smith, Ryan, and Stewart Butterfield. “An Interview with Slack CEO Stewart Butterfield.” (PDF) Qualtrics, 2017. Retrieved March 14, 2018.

UX Researcher at ADP

New York, New York, USA

Meghan WenzelAt ADP, Meghan conducts research across products and platforms. She focuses mainly on qualitative research, conducting a wide range of exploratory, concept testing, and usability research. She’s involved in ADP’s Come See for Yourself contextual-inquiry program, whose goal is to educate associates on the value of UX research and get them out into the field to talk to real users.  Read More

Other Articles on Culture Change

New on UXmatters