In my previous column, Designing the Judgment Layer: How UX Governs AI Autonomy,” I briefly explored the need to plan for composition in an era of open, interoperable systems. A pattern is emerging: UX designers can no longer assume a fixed application boundary or a fully knowable set of user journeys. As artificial intelligence (AI) systems, application programming interfaces (APIs), data services, and enterprise workflows become more interconnected, designers must focus less on controlling the whole experience and more on shaping the conditions under which we can safely compose experiences.
We’re moving from an application-centric view of software toward an ecosystem-centric one. In this new environment, a user’s experience might not begin and end within the product the user owns. Instead, the user experience might be constructed across products after being triggered by an AI agent, be embedded within another system, or be experienced through a user interface that we did not design. In this column, I’ll explore the following topics:
Search results no longer comprise a list of ten blue links. Today, the search experience represents an ecosystem of answers that an artificial intelligence (AI) generates. When users search on AI-driven platforms such as Google, Bing, ChatGPT, or Gemini, these systems often present instant answers, summaries, maps, and conversational responses—before users even scroll.
Shifts in the search experience have fundamentally changed how users interact with search systems by integrating answer-engine optimization (AEO), generative engine optimization (GEO), and UX design solutions that present results in an entirely new way. With the rise of AI-powered search results, voice assistants, map-based discovery, and conversational user interfaces, users expect immediate, relevant, and context-aware responses. Bain’s research finds that 80% of consumers now rely on these zero-click results at least 40% of the time, making this zero-click experience the dominant experience. Read More
Multimodal user experiences are no longer futuristic. The way they work is closer to how people already operate. We talk and gesture at the same time. We look at things while referring to them. We adjust what we’re saying mid-sentence. For a long time, user interfaces didn’t allow that. We had to translate everything into taps or typed commands. One input at a time. This was fine when computing took place on a single screen. It’s less realistic now.
In multimodal UX design, voice, touch, gesture, and context overlap, as shown in Figure 1. Users can speak, then tap, then glance to confirm, without the system becoming confused. Artificial intelligence (AI) is making multimodal user experiences possible by holding everything together, interpreting the user’s intent, and adapting—so successive user interactions don’t feel like starting from zero. Read More
Accessibility is not a side project. Designing for accessibility is what determines whether a product works at all for a large group of people. About 1.3 billion people globally, roughly 16% of the world’s population, live with some form of disability. Thus, designing for accessibility is not edge case.
You’ll quickly become aware of this reality once you start shipping products. The moment someone can’t complete a form, navigate a menu, or read your content, the need for accessibility stops being theoretical.
Plus, the need for accessible design is not just about serving those with permanent disabilities. You can identify use cases that require accessible design from the ways people actually use a product. For example, people might watch videos without sound because they’re in public or try to tap through a workflow with one hand because they’re trying to get something done quickly. Captions are a simple example. Most people who use them aren’t deaf. They just don’t want to miss what’s being said. These are the gaps. Read More
Startup cultures often celebrate a fail-fast, fail-forward mindset. While this can be a powerful driver of innovation, it can also lead to catastrophic product flops. According to recent reports, the leading cause of startup failure is the lack of a market need for a product, with cash-flow issues following closely. The truth is, many startup failures could have been prevented by a simple, strategic investment in a UX audit at a critical stage.
For startups, a UX audit is a proactive, highly efficient process that acts as a health check for a product. It’s about more than evaluating aesthetics; it’s about identifying usability flaws, design inconsistencies, and user painpoints that can silently erode a user base and drain a company’s resources. Read More
“You don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.”—Bob Dylan
It’s been over a year since I began thinking about the foundations of this series about designing artificial intelligence (AI). In that time, the proliferation of AI—especially general-purpose, multimodal large language models (LLMs) and agentic AI—has accelerated, and its capabilities continue to grow. However, the challenges of interacting with and relying on probabilistic systems persist. As with any significant technological advance, there isn’t always a straight path forward.
Even though AI is seemingly everywhere, this story is still unfolding. A fundamental question remains: how do we design for interacting minds? Read More
On June 1, 2009, Air France Flight 447 disappeared over the Atlantic Ocean. The subsequent investigation revealed a chain of failures, but the triggering event was surprisingly mundane: ice crystals blocked the aircraft’s speed sensors, causing the autopilot to disconnect. The pilots, who had been monitoring and trusting the automated system for hours, suddenly had to fly the plane manually. They had the necessary instruments and the training to employ them properly. What they didn’t have was the cognitive readiness to take over because hours of reliable automation had lulled them into a state where active piloting felt unfamiliar.
The aviation-safety community has a term for this: automation complacency. This term describes the tendency for human operators to reduce their vigilance and engagement with a task as their trust in an automated system performing that task increases. This is one of the most studied phenomena in human-factors research, with decades of evidence from cockpits, control rooms, and monitoring stations. Read More
There’s a moment, somewhere between opening an application and getting what you need, where a good user experience just seems to disappear. Users stop noticing the user interface (UI). They’re just doing whatever they’re doing to achieve their goal.
That has always been the dream—having a barely noticeable, calm UI that’s just there. In 2026, AI is finally making this real, and the implications for how we design digital experiences are bigger than most people are yet willing to admit. But before we proceed at warp speed to achieving visual harmony, we have to ask: is UX design in danger? Read More
Most companies don’t lose customers because of a bad product. They lose them because of a customer’s bad experience using a product. This is a harsh truth. In 2026, with users having more choices and shorter patience than ever, the gap between a perfectly designed product and a poorly designed one shows up directly in a company’s revenue.
In this article, I’ll break down how UX design services can shape business outcomes, what trends are now defining this space, and why getting this right matters more now than ever. Read More
Customer-relationship management (CRM) systems exist to help businesses achieve better sales operations and enhanced customer understanding, ultimately leading to increased revenues. Some organizations face difficulties with CRM system implementation when they spend a lot of money on a system but achieve low user-adoption rates. Sales teams think of CRM platforms as requiring administrative tasks that hinder their ability to work efficiently.
People face their main technology problem because of the way they utilize this technology. When CRM systems become challenging to navigate and consume excessive amounts of users’ time while lacking integration with actual business processes, users stop using them. UX design becomes essential to solving this problem. A user-centered design for a CRM can transform a system from a compliance tool into a powerful sales enabler. Read More